Dan Jones shared 9 days ago

Amazon's "First Reads" is no longer a free book every month. It's now discounted to $1.99 every month. 😞

Dan Jones shared 9 days ago

I work for a software and DevOps consultancy firm, which means that I get an assignment to build software for one of my company's customers. (I'm on a US DOD cybersecurity contract).

I'm sitting in the monthly All-Hands meeting, and I had to turn off my camera, because I didn't want everyone to see how much I'm rolling my eyes right now.

Our Chief Digital Officer says that a recent MIT study shows that only 5% of new software projects built on AI actually make it to market. And that's why we have to go all in on AI to fill that market gap where others are failing.

He also started by saying that as we move towards AI-focused work, we're doing so to "distinguish ourselves". Yeah. We're going to "distinguish ourselves" by jumping into the bandwagon that everyone else is jumping into.

🙄 :facepalm: :rage4:

Dan Jones shared 12 days ago
Dan Jones shared 13 days ago
Dan Jones shared 13 days ago
Dan Jones shared 14 days ago
Dan Jones shared 14 days ago
Dan Jones shared 14 days ago
Dan Jones shared 14 days ago
Dan Jones shared 14 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago
Dan Jones shared 15 days ago

I recently read through the Inclusive Language Guide put out by the Academy Software Foundation (part of the Linux Foundation).

I think this is a great guide, and I went back to it today to check myself on a term I regularly use, but is specifically singled out in this guide as being ableist. The phrase is "sanity check". I assume the ableist implications here are obvious, so I wont' go into that.

But I'm having trouble with an appropriate alternative. The alternatives suggested in the guide (validation check, consistency check, logic check, gut check) don't quite match up for me.

I would normally use this phrase like this: "Hey, Vanessa, could you have a look at my code? I think I've got everything here, but something is bugging me about it; could give me a sanity check?" Everyone I work with understands that usage. By it, I mean, "Can you make sure that I didn't miss something obvious?"

For now, I think I'm just going to say that: "Can you make sure that I didn't miss something obvious?" But it's pretty wordy, and I'd like to find a more concise way to say that that would be easily understood by other developers without having to use all of those words.

Any suggestion?