Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago
Dan Jones shared 3 months ago

I recently read through the Inclusive Language Guide put out by the Academy Software Foundation (part of the Linux Foundation).

I think this is a great guide, and I went back to it today to check myself on a term I regularly use, but is specifically singled out in this guide as being ableist. The phrase is "sanity check". I assume the ableist implications here are obvious, so I wont' go into that.

But I'm having trouble with an appropriate alternative. The alternatives suggested in the guide (validation check, consistency check, logic check, gut check) don't quite match up for me.

I would normally use this phrase like this: "Hey, Vanessa, could you have a look at my code? I think I've got everything here, but something is bugging me about it; could give me a sanity check?" Everyone I work with understands that usage. By it, I mean, "Can you make sure that I didn't miss something obvious?"

For now, I think I'm just going to say that: "Can you make sure that I didn't miss something obvious?" But it's pretty wordy, and I'd like to find a more concise way to say that that would be easily understood by other developers without having to use all of those words.

Any suggestion?

Dan Jones shared 4 months ago

I'm having heart surgery this week. It's a pretty common procedure with low risk and high probability of success, but they are cutting my chest open and tinkering with my heart, so it's not nothing.

But, my five-year-old, since learning that I was having trouble with my heart, and the doctors were going to help it, has been super adorable. Multiple times a day she comes up to me and kisses me on my chest, because she wants to kiss my heart to make it feel better. She brought me some water last night telling me it was good for my heart

This is a hate crime, and also looks like it slaps.

Screenshot of a YouTube Music playlist titled Oldies by Paulo Hintz, containing 64 songs. The first three are visible: You Oughta Know by Alanis Morrissette, Complicated by Avril Lavigne, and Lovefool by The Cardigans
Caption

Screenshot of a YouTube Music playlist titled Oldies by Paulo Hintz, containing 64 songs. The first three are visible: You Oughta Know by Alanis Morrissette, Complicated by Avril Lavigne, and Lovefool by The Cardigans

Yesterday, I got a text from an AI recruiter called Riley from Apex Systems. It said it was reaching out about a backend developer position, and if I'd like to hear more, to reply "CALL" to receive a callback from it.

I was tempted to get the callback out of curiosity, but the whole thing was just too weird.

Since I didn't reply, it followed up today with an email with more information about the job. The job was using a language I've never used before, it was a contract position (I currently have a permanent position), and making just a bit more than half of what I'm currently making.

So, basically useless. And the fact that it addressed me by my proper name (Daniel), when I go by Dan everywhere online and on my resume made it so much weirder.

I would describe myself as an AI skeptic with serious concerns about the technology, but I don't complete dismiss out-of-hand. I use an AI coding agent from time to time, and brainstorm with ChatGPT regularly. But I don't think I'll interacting with any AI recruiters any time soon.

It might as well be a robocall.

Dan Jones shared 4 months ago
Dan Jones shared 4 months ago
Dan Jones shared 4 months ago
Dan Jones shared 4 months ago
Dan Jones shared 4 months ago

Here I am at 6am, sitting on the floor of my 8-year-old's bedroom, quoting René Descartes, in an attempt to convince him to get out of bed and get ready for school.